Skip to content

Developers & IPPs

Build the sites that can actually connect

Screen any candidate for grid connection before you option land, pay a guarantee or file the request. Any country. Up to two hours each.

€13M

Cost of holding a 200 MW project in the queue, at 8% cost of capital

A site that cannot connect costs the same to hold as one that can. The queue will not tell you which one you have.

What you can do with Noda

Five things you can do before the money moves

  1. 01

    Build a site.

    Pick any point in any country. Set the technology and the export you want. That is enough for a screening to begin.

  2. 02

    Ask what actually decides the project.

    Grid, yield, finance, permits, routing, curtailment. Pick from the catalogue or type the question in your own words.

  3. 03

    Hand over what you already have.

    Whatever the site already has on it: drawings, letters, models, scans. Noda extracts them and treats them as your proprietary evidence.

  4. 04

    Screen every candidate on the same evidence.

    Compare fifty sites the way you would compare rows in a spreadsheet, and move the pipeline toward the ones that can connect.

  5. 05

    Take a defensible answer to the call.

    A report with the verdict and the conditions, and a source class on every number. Nothing invented to fill a gap.

With and without Noda

The answer that decides the project arrives after the money

Without Noda
With Noda

One engineer, twenty tabs, and a decision worth tens of millions.

Every candidate screened the same way, in up to two hours.

The verdict arrives after the land, the guarantees and the fees.

The verdict before you file anything.

One system study costs five figures and takes months, and it can come back negative.

Run the site first. Find out whether the study is worth buying.

Reinforcement costs and a connection point kilometres away, found late.

Connection point, capacity, reinforcement cost and date in the first pass.

You screen the one site you already committed to.

You screen all fifty.

The platform

From a boundary you draw to a verdict you can defend

  • Build a site anywhere in the world.

    Pick a point in any country, set the technology and the export you want. Solar, wind, storage or a hybrid — storage sizing is part of the same step, not another one.

    The Noda map console with a site drawn over farmland in Germany, its edges measured in metres, and the layer panel open
  • Pin the questions that decide it.

    Grid, yield, finance, permits, routing, curtailment. Rank the eight that matter or type the question your engineer would type, and the report answers those first.

    The Noda console asking what will be built inside the drawn area, with solar, wind, storage and hybrid options
  • Hand over the data room, keep working.

    Operator letters, drawings, parcel boundaries, financial models, scans. Noda extracts them, joins them to the site, and keeps them private to your account.

    The Noda console asking what else is known about the project, with a drop area that takes any format up to 50 MB per file
  • Watch a specialist team work the site.

    One agent per aspect, one shared ledger. They read the operator's own published documents and write the analysis the site needs, from network build to Monte Carlo.

    Used 21 tools

    • checking the relevant skill · done
    • running a tool program · done
    • reading the site details · done
    • checking uploaded documents · done
    • checking the time · done
    • checking the site map layers · done
    • checking past runs search · done
    • checking route check · done
    • checking save json · done
    • updating the working plan · done

    Project Area — the team

    The project area at the centre of its five specialistsProject AreaS1ScoutQ2QuinnZ3ZonaR4RemyE5Era
  • Take a report that carries its sources.

    Every figure is labelled source-backed, operator-confirmed, modelled or missing and links to the document behind it. The verdict and the open clarifications sit at the top.

    A Noda decision report: keep the site, do not commit 21 MW yet, with the confidence, viability and firm screen figures beside it

See it on a site you have already screened.

Bring one you finished the long way and compare what comes back. If it tells your engineer nothing new, we have not earned the seat.

The three questions we hear on the first developer call

We do not replace your engineers. We replace the work around the site. Bring one you have already finished and compare. If it tells your engineer nothing new, we have not earned the seat.

Nobody publishes who cut the grass in a field, but if the neighbour keeps cows and the cut is uneven rather than flat, you know, and Noda reaches an answer the same way, from the data points around the one that is missing.

No. It should not replace the work, it should help with the work. You get the answer within two hours, then your engineers apply their knowledge to it.

Power grid infrastructure
noda
Noda

We use cookies

Necessary cookies keep the site working. Optional analytics cookies help us understand which campaigns drive interest. No data is shared with third parties. Privacy policy