Investors & Funds
You always have projects. You never have time to evaluate them all.
A first cut on every site in the pipeline: can it connect, at what capacity, at what reinforcement cost, and when. Up to two hours each, any country, with the buildup behind every number.
Connection requests across Europe in 2024, up 133% on 2021
Europe’s connection queues grew faster than anyone can assess them. Most of what is in them will never be built.
What you can do with Noda
Five things you can do before it reaches the committee
- 01
Build the site from the teaser.
A coordinate, the technology and the export the seller is claiming. That is enough for a screening to begin, in any country, before the non-binding offer.
- 02
Ask what the committee will challenge.
Grid, yield, finance, permits, routing, curtailment. Pick from the catalogue or type the question in your own words, and the report answers those first.
- 03
Point it at the data room you were sent.
Operator letters, drawings, parcel boundaries, financial models, scanned surveys. Noda extracts them and treats them as your proprietary evidence.
- 04
Screen the pipeline, not the shortlist.
Every site gets the same first cut, so the diligence budget goes to the ones that survive it rather than the ones you already liked.
- 05
Take a verdict that survives the committee.
The verdict with its conditions, and a class on every figure: source-backed, operator-confirmed, modelled or missing. Nothing invented to fill a gap.
With and without Noda
The grid decides which projects survive, and it answers last
Guarantees, application fees and auction tranches are committed before the operator computes anything. Spain takes 40 EUR per kilowatt before an access request is even processed — two million euros on a 50 MW site.
Without NodaYou evaluate the sites you already like.
With NodaYou evaluate all of them, on the same evidence.
Without NodaOne first cut every six months.
With NodaOne every two hours.
Without NodaA number with no working behind it.
With NodaThe buildup: which document, which assumption, which class.
Without NodaGrid risk carried into the committee as a fifty-fifty.
With NodaGrid risk priced, with the conditions that would flip it.
Without NodaReinforcement cost appears after the capital.
With NodaReinforcement cost appears in the first pass.
The platform
From a boundary you draw to a verdict you can defend
Put any site in the pipeline on the map.
A point in any country, the technology, and the export the seller is claiming. That is enough for a run, before the non-binding offer.
Pin the questions the committee will ask.
Grid, yield, finance, permits, routing, curtailment. Rank the eight that decide this investment, or type the question in your own words.
Hand over the seller's data room whole.
Operator letters, drawings, parcel boundaries, financial models, scans. Extracted, joined to the site, and private to your account — nothing reaches another fund.
Let a specialist team do the first cut.
One agent per aspect, one shared ledger. They read the operator's own documents and you watch the ledger fill in, one figure at a time.
Used 21 tools
- checking the relevant skill · done
- running a tool program · done
- reading the site details · done
- checking uploaded documents · done
- checking the time · done
- checking the site map layers · done
- checking past runs search · done
- checking route check · done
- checking save json · done
- updating the working plan · done
Project Area — the team
Take a first cut upstairs, not a black box.
The verdict with its conditions, the connection point, capacity under N-1, reinforcement cost and timing. Every figure says whether it is source-backed, operator-confirmed, modelled or missing.
See it on a project whose outcome you know.
Pick one where part of the answer is already in, agree the criteria before we start, and judge the report on those.
The three questions we hear on the first fund call
That is true. It is why the first runs we do with a fund are benchmarks against projects they have already completed, with real outcomes known, and why we will publish the first comparison whichever way it goes.
No. You can see the buildup: which documents were read, which numbers were computed, which were modelled, and what would change the verdict.
Yes. Pick projects where you already know part of the outcome, agree the evaluation criteria before we start, and judge it on those.
